Sunday, August 19, 2012

A Response to Island Civilizations


                Which came first, humans or the Earth? Now it’s quite obvious to anyone with a day’s worth of schooling that the Earth came first. Humans and their selfish ways evolved after years of coddling by their ancient mother and have grown to be the big-shots on the planet. We have bullied all of Earth’s other species into doing what we want them to do. And as with all bullies we can either stand up to them and save all of the good of the planet or irreparably scar the Earth for the rest of her life. In his essay Island Civilizations Professor Nash reflects upon human’s treatment of the Earth in the past and presents some sobering possibilities for our future.
                As Nash reflects upon humanity’s advancements in the last few millennia he shares how we as a species have grown over that time span, bending nature to our will with little regard for the ramifications. We created this idea of “wilderness” because as we found things we could control there were also things humans could not. And of course seeing no greater challenge our species sought to conquer it all to use its finite resources to fuel our infinite appetite. Soon however, as the frontier vanished and imperialism had spread it furthest, humans slowly began to realize that the Earth is only so big and has only so much to offer. The wasting of its resources may leave lasting damage if it is not soon checked. Nash points out the early warnings of many writers and it is not until the end of the second millennium that they are heeded and anything serious is done about it.  Nash equates humanity to a cancer that is eating away at the earth and it is not until the 1960’s that the threatening wilderness becomes less of a “liability” and more of an “asset” to be protected.
                Thankfully Nash does not just use a condescending tone and avid finger-pointing but he also lays out a goal for change, because “goals are the first steps in solving problems.” He first scares us with the popular “wasteland” scenario that has the Earth a thousand years from now as a desolate skeleton from what it is today as a result of our thoughtless poisoning and waste. Then he goes to a somewhat better outlook where humans control every aspect of the ecosystem but there is a gross lack of diversity within. There is a very unappealing idea of abandoning technology and life as we know it by reverting back to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle but Nash supports his own idea of “Island Civilizations” where humans focus their impact on the earth in pocket sized areas across the globe. Nash provides that we can grow technologically as much as we want within these islands, putting them wherever we wish and even using certain locations as recreational facilities. Nash also wishes that environmentalism become a chief concern and be included in every child’s growth as a human.
                Altogether Nash gives a very valid argument that, as he says, sets a goal for humanity over the next couple of hundred years. These small islands of civilization remind me of the islands of A Brave New World where the questioning or enlightened are banished to protect the balance and order of the new world. The idea of mankind living in harmony is a wonderful one but I find it hard to believe all of humanity would change their lifestyle so drastically, even if we could somehow survive the ramifications of eliminating five million people from our population. But even with all of the difficulties associated with the islands Nash gave us plenty of time to realize his dream, and we have at least taken baby steps in this direction. Boy Scouts are well versed in taking care of nature as they camp in it, learn from it, and enjoy it. Scouts have helped to spread the Leave No Trace principles of camping that make a point of leaving any aspects of nature the way you found them. This may not seem very important but if any sort of goal is wished to be reached someone has to take the first baby steps.

1 comment:

  1. I agree that Nash's Island Civilization is a wonderful idea but I also find it hard to believe that all of humanity would change their ways. In order for Island Civilization to work, everyone needs work together. However, I do think that if we could eliminate five million people from our population, the idea of an Island Civilization is much more reasonable.

    ReplyDelete