Which
came first, humans or the Earth? Now it’s quite obvious to anyone with a day’s
worth of schooling that the Earth came first. Humans and their selfish ways
evolved after years of coddling by their ancient mother and have grown to be
the big-shots on the planet. We have bullied all of Earth’s other species into
doing what we want them to do. And as with all bullies we can either stand up
to them and save all of the good of the planet or irreparably scar the Earth
for the rest of her life. In his essay Island
Civilizations Professor Nash reflects upon human’s treatment of the Earth
in the past and presents some sobering possibilities for our future.
As
Nash reflects upon humanity’s advancements in the last few millennia he shares
how we as a species have grown over that time span, bending nature to our will
with little regard for the ramifications. We created this idea of “wilderness” because
as we found things we could control there were also things humans could not.
And of course seeing no greater challenge our species sought to conquer it all
to use its finite resources to fuel our infinite appetite. Soon however, as the
frontier vanished and imperialism had spread it furthest, humans slowly began
to realize that the Earth is only so big and has only so much to offer. The wasting
of its resources may leave lasting damage if it is not soon checked. Nash
points out the early warnings of many writers and it is not until the end of
the second millennium that they are heeded and anything serious is done about
it. Nash equates humanity to a cancer
that is eating away at the earth and it is not until the 1960’s that the
threatening wilderness becomes less of a “liability” and more of an “asset” to
be protected.
Thankfully
Nash does not just use a condescending tone and avid finger-pointing but he
also lays out a goal for change, because “goals are the first steps in solving
problems.” He first scares us with the popular “wasteland” scenario that has
the Earth a thousand years from now as a desolate skeleton from what it is
today as a result of our thoughtless poisoning and waste. Then he goes to a
somewhat better outlook where humans control every aspect of the ecosystem but
there is a gross lack of diversity within. There is a very unappealing idea of
abandoning technology and life as we know it by reverting back to the
hunter-gatherer lifestyle but Nash supports his own idea of “Island
Civilizations” where humans focus their impact on the earth in pocket sized
areas across the globe. Nash provides that we can grow technologically as much
as we want within these islands, putting them wherever we wish and even using
certain locations as recreational facilities. Nash also wishes that
environmentalism become a chief concern and be included in every child’s growth
as a human.
Altogether
Nash gives a very valid argument that, as he says, sets a goal for humanity
over the next couple of hundred years. These small islands of civilization
remind me of the islands of A Brave New World where the questioning or enlightened
are banished to protect the balance and order of the new world. The idea of
mankind living in harmony is a wonderful one but I find it hard to believe all
of humanity would change their lifestyle so drastically, even if we could
somehow survive the ramifications of eliminating five million people from our
population. But even with all of the difficulties associated with the islands
Nash gave us plenty of time to realize his dream, and we have at least taken
baby steps in this direction. Boy Scouts are well versed in taking care of
nature as they camp in it, learn from it, and enjoy it. Scouts have helped to
spread the Leave No Trace principles of camping that make a point of leaving
any aspects of nature the way you found them. This may not seem very important
but if any sort of goal is wished to be reached someone has to take the first
baby steps.
I agree that Nash's Island Civilization is a wonderful idea but I also find it hard to believe that all of humanity would change their ways. In order for Island Civilization to work, everyone needs work together. However, I do think that if we could eliminate five million people from our population, the idea of an Island Civilization is much more reasonable.
ReplyDelete